• Creator
    Topic
  • #75
    FEAT BC Admin
    Keymaster

    In this topic area, discussion is about the fight to secure Government funding for your A.B.A. treatment program. It is also the place to talk about your thoughts and ideas about how to establish new Government programs specifically designed for autism treatment.

    This is the place to hear input from parents who have fought for funding and won, as well as those who have fought for funding and would like to share their horror stories. There is a tendency to not share success stories once funding is secured. Please fight that tendency. By sharing our experience, we all become stronger.

     


    —-By FEAT BC (Freeman) on Saturday, January 3, 1998 – 03:16 pm:

    -Hi everyone!

    These are some things to think about in your dealings with government to help you to obtain support for your child’s Autism Treatment Program. These are my personal opinions and do not represent those of FEAT of BC or any other organization.

    Many of these observations are based on my personal experiences (and I believe it poetic justice to help every parent avoid being systematically abused by their social worker the way I was).

    Good luck to everyone! (Let’s all pull back the curtain on the Wizard of OZ).

    Sabrina

     


    How To Fight for Funding for Autism Treatment and Appropriate School Placement

    1. Establish a Paper Trail

    Always take notes, documenting major points of all conversations with government and school officials.

    This includes casual, in person conversations with social workers as well as ALL telephone conversations. All key points of discussion must be written down in your notes including the date and time of the discussion. This includes what was agreed upon, as well as what was not agreed upon.

    Then the notes should be used to write a letter recapping the substance and content of the conversation. This letter must then be mailed or faxed to the person with whom you had the conversation. In addition, a copy must be kept in your file (see section on the icci game).

    Why?

    It is important to formalize the interaction between you and Government officials. In addition, everyone is put on notice that they must closely adhere to their responsibilities, regulations and laws., Furthermore, they must then consider the paper trail you have created. This lets everyone know that the interaction can become public and that any abuses of power and authority can be formally appealed and/or publicized.

    In other words, they canit use discretion unfairly under the cloak of secrecy.

    2. Submit all Requests in Writing

    All your requests for your child must be submitted formally in writing with a copy included in your file and a copy, if necessary, sent to their immediate superiors.

    3. Set Deadlines for Action

    All formal requests for action must have a reasonable deadline set for that action. If no action or response is received by the deadline you have set (two weeks for example), then you will interpret the lack of response as a formal declination (a formal NO) of your requests.

    Why Set Deadlines?

    When bureaucrats do not want to do something, they will stall by ignoring you and your request. (As an aside, in the study of the bureaucracy, this is known as ithe power to do nothingi). They can string you along for years. When you have determined that the person you are interacting with is not inclined to help you or is not dealing in good faith, then you must take the initiative and formally label his/her behavior as obstructionist and de facto as a declination (a NO to your requests). This allows you to move to the next level of authority on your timetable to present your case. This takes the power to do nothing away from the bureaucrat with whom you are dealing. Simple stated, a bureaucrat who stalls and does nothing becomes irrelevant (use your invisible spray) and you move on to the next level of authority.

    How to icci?

    A cc. is a copy of your letter sent to someone other than the person you are writing. You put the cc. at the bottom left-hand corner of your letter followed by 2 spaces and the name of the person or people to whom you want to send a copy of the letter.

    Who to icci to?

    Sometimes it is best not to icci at all, especially in the early stages of the relationship (for example, your first letter to a social worker requesting assistance). This gives them the opportunity to do the right thing and does not present you as an overly combative person. When you start to run into problems, it is a good idea to send the icci to the 2 immediate superiors of the person you are having problems with. We do not recommend icciing all the way up the chain of command, since you want to give them a chance to solve the problem at the local level.

    Why send a icci copy?

    The reason for playing the icci game is that you want your interactions with the official to be known to his superior and possibly to other organizations so that 1) their action or inaction becomes a matter of record and 2) the individual knows he is being monitored. This helps minimize abuses of power and authority and helps encourage the official to meet their obligations and do the right thing.

    What is the sequence of letters?

    Find out the chain of command of the particular bureaucracy you are battling.

    TOP

    Minister
    Deputy Minister
    Children’s Ministry’s local region chain of command, all the way down to the District Supervisor
    and Social Worker
    Contacts can be found at the government directory: http://www.dir.gov.bc.ca/

    BOTTOM

    Start at the bottom and climb. At the Regional Operating Officer (ROO) level (once you have been declined) you have to decide whether to jump up to the top, threaten and then go to the media, or both. A word of wisdom: DO NOT BLUFF. If you are not willing to go all the way, they will ‘smell’ this. You must be prepared to take it right up to the Minister and beyond.

    Documentation from Experts:

    In your arsenal to fight for your child, it is wise to get his/her pediatrician and/or psychiatrist to write a letter on your childis behalf. In addition, any other experts who know your child and are sympathetic to what you are trying to do should become involved.

    When to hire a lawyer?

    If money is not an issue, you can hire a lawyer when you get to the area manager level. Make sure that you have a paper trail so the lawyer has something to work with. Also, have the lawyer give F.E.A.T. of B.C. a call, and we will send him/her information that will help.

    If money is an issue (as it is for most of us running autism treatment programs), you might want to hire a lawyer once you have been turned down by the Minister.

    How to hire a lawyer?

    The type of lawyer needed is a litigator, or trial lawyer. S/he does not need to be an expert in autism, or special needs; s/he needs to be experienced in suing governments, and enjoys being in court. Word of mouth is a good way to find a lawyer.

Viewing 10 replies - 801 through 810 (of 2,008 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1995
    Dione Costanzo
    Participant

    Join Us For a Fun-Raising Party!

    FEAT of BC/Medicare for Autism Now!
    Buffet Dinner Featuring Grilled Salmon

    Saturday, June 21, 2008
    7-10PM at the Home of Dione and Marc

    Stay Connected!
    Get a campaign update! Hear what steps are next!
    Help raise awareness and support! Have fun!

    This is a free event. Wine and donations graciously accepted.

    Please contact dionec@shaw.ca for more details

    We look forward to seeing you there!

    FEAT of BC

    #1996
    Andrew Kavchak
    Participant

    News Alert! Cabinet shuffle in the works…?

    Will the Health Minister ("considered a solid performer in his current file") move to another portfolio? Who will be the next Health Minister? And what will they know about autism? What impact will this have on the "Medicare for AUTISM Now!" movement and election strategy?

    From CTV.ca:

    Major cabinet shuffle expected in coming weeks
    Updated Tue. May. 27 2008

    CTV.ca News Staff

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper is planning a wide-ranging cabinet shuffle that is expected to see Finance Minister Jim Flaherty switch places with Industry Minister Jim Prentice, senior insiders tell CTV News.

    The shuffle is expected to take place in late June or early July, and follows the sudden resignation of Maxime Bernier as the foreign affairs minister.

    Sources say Flaherty wants to expand Industry Canada. That would allow Prentice, the unofficial deputy prime minister, to take over Flaherty's portfolio.

    Secretary of State Helena Guergis is expected to be dropped because she's blamed for mishandling the Brenda Martin case. Martin spent two years in a Mexican prison and critics accused the government of doing little to bring her home, although she was eventually found guilty in an Internet fraud scheme.

    Treasury Board President Vic Toews is expected to leave his post because of personal reasons, although he's in line for a federal judgeship.

    Harper will likely announce that David Emerson will stay on as foreign affairs minister – the former Liberal MP took over the position after Bernier stepped down, and he already runs a special committee on Afghanistan.

    That would open Emerson's other position as minister of trade. Sources say there are two possible candidates for the portfolio: either Health Minister Tony Clement, who is considered a solid performer in his current file, or Immigration Minister Diane Finley, who successfully oversaw the recent immigration bill.

    Three backbench MPs will likely be promoted to cabinet: British Columbia MP James Moore, Nova Scotia MP Gerald Keddy, and Manitoba MP Rod Bruinooge.

    Bernier was forced to resign after he left classified government documents in the home of his former girlfriend Julie Couillard, who has had personal connections with people involved in the biker underworld.

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper, currently on a three-day tour of Europe, told reporters that Bernier made a crucial mistake.

    "You obviously don't disclose classified materials and you certainly take adequate care to ensure that they are not disclosed and they are not left behind somewhere," he said.

    With a report by CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife

    #1997
    Andrew Kavchak
    Participant

    Hi Folks,

    Ever wonder whether the federal government's cabinet and the government caucus coordinate their thinking and communication lines (oops! I mean propaganda lines) to the public? Sometimes their messages are so contradictory it would make you laugh if the issues were not so serious.

    Just over a week ago Mike Lake, the Edmonton MP who has an autistic son, was on the W5 television program stating that the federal government could not force the provinces to provide autism treatment in Medicare on the basis that the feds are not "above" the provinces and that they are "equal partners in confederation". Any discussion of taking a leadership role in the circumstances and even calling a conference with the provinces on the issue was a non-starter. The most we can expect from the Health Minister is a website and things like that.

    But this government is pretty good at cherry-picking its priorities and initiatives. Just like the way the former Liberal government and Prime Minister Paul Martin stated that "you can't pick and chose" which Charter rights you defend as his explanation for his (and Justice Minister Irwin Cotler's) stand in promoting the legalization of same-sex marriages under the equality provisions, while at the same time contradicting themselves by sending a platoon of government lawyers to defeat the Auton case at the Supreme Court of Canada, since the last budget the current Finance Minister has been plugging away at creating a national securities regulator.

    This idea of a national securities regulator has been bouncing around for years, but it is a matter of provincial jurisdiction and the provinces have consistently opposed the idea of a national regulator. Just this morning again on national news television there was more discussion of what next steps Minister Flaherty will pursue to further his objective.

    But he better watch out!!! Mike Lake might thwart his initiatives and bring down his political career by reminding him in private and humiliating him in public by pointing out that….the feds are not "above" the provinces and that the two levels of government are "partners in confederation" and the feds have no business demonstrating leadership in areas that are not of their exclusive jurisdiction, etc… Or will he?

    That would be the consistent thing to do of course. Chances are he won't. Getting a national securities regulator is critical of course. Getting autism treatment…well…that jurisdiction thing gets in the way again.

    Like Jean Lewis said time and time again…it's just a matter of political will. Up to now, there has not been any for our kids.

    #1998
    Andrew Kavchak
    Participant

    Hi Folks,

    As the letter writer below reminds us, over a year and a half ago the House of Commons voted on and passed a Motion to create a National Autism Strategy.
    In fact, the original Motion has tabled by Andy Scott (the former Liberal Cabinet Minister) was amended by the Conservatives in November 2006 (with some work behind the scenes being done by autism parent and Conservative MP Mike Lake). The two texts are below. The final version was voted on and passed on December 5, 2006 with the entire Bloc voting against it (to their shame).

    Regrettably, Motions are not law or binding and the feds are still not making any contribution or taking any action that can be said to directly or indirectly help our kids get access to treatment. Our community presented Mr. Scott with an engraved gift to thank him for his efforts immediately after the vote. Mike Lake showed up at the reception and claimed to have made contributions to the Motion being passed (which appear to involve watering down the original text). Perhaps Mike Lake could now respond to the letter writer's concerns and explain what the government has done to implement the Motion?

    Original motion table by Andy Scott:

    Motion no. 172

    M-172 That, in the opinion of the House, the government should create a national strategy for autism spectrum disorder that would include:

    (a) the establishment, in cooperation with provincial governments, of national standards for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder and the delivery of related services;

    (b) the study, in cooperation with provincial governments, of the funding arrangements for the care of those with autism spectrum disorder, including the possibility of transferring federal funds to assist provincial governments to provide no-cost treatment, education, professional training and other required supports for Canadians with autism spectrum disorder without unreasonable wait times;

    (c) the creation of a national surveillance program for autism spectrum disorder to be managed by the Public Health Agency of Canada; and

    (d) the provision of funding for health research into treatments for autism spectrum disorder.

    Motion as amended November 27, 2006:

    That, in the opinion of the House, the government should create a national strategy for autism spectrum disorder that would include:

    (a) the development, in cooperation with provincial/territorial governments, of evidence based standards for the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorder;

    (b) development, in cooperation with provincial governments, of innovative funding methods for the care of those with autism spectrum disorder;

    (c) consulting with provincial/territorial governments and other stakeholders on the requirements of implementing a national surveillance program for autism spectrum disorders; and

    (d) the provision of additional federal funding for health research into autism spectrum disorder.
    _______________________________
    NEW BRUNSWICK TELEGRAPH-JOURNAL
    Saturday, May 24, 2008

    Letters to the editor

    Parties urged to take autism stand

    Over a year and a half ago, the House passed a motion for the creation of a National Autism Strategy.

    As a parent of a child with autism I wonder what will happen when my wife and I are gone.

    As a member of the Forces, I wonder why, should a member get posted, there is not the same level of treatment, service and support coast-to-coast.

    As a voter I wonder when a party will take a public stand on autism and move forward the issues facing individuals, families and society.

    BRIAN RIMPILAINEN
    Fredericton
    ___________________

    #1999
    Super Dad
    Participant

    http://www.medbroadcast.com/channel_health_news_details.asp?news_id=15426

    Ontario Appeal Court tosses ailing autism lawsuit thin lifeline

    May. 23, 2008

    Provided by: The Canadian Press
    Written by: Colin Perkel, THE CANADIAN PRESS

    Parents fighting to have their autistic children receive expensive, specialized therapies within the public education system were tossed a thin lifeline by Ontario's highest court Friday.

    In a unanimous ruling, the Ontario Court of Appeal essentially handed back the parents some of their claims against the Ontario government and seven school boards, saying they need to be substantially reworked if they are to have any hope of succeeding in their lawsuit.

    "I would say it's a mixed outcome," said David Baker, the lawyer representing the parents.

    "The issue of charter damages and the issue of negligence (was) reopened – to a degree."

    Baker said it was still too soon to say whether the group would now go back to the lower courts to try again on those issues.

    The five families are trying to sue the Ontario government and the school boards for negligence and damages, accusing them of failing to provide or properly fund the specialized autism therapies – known as intensive behavioural intervention (IBI) and applied behaviour analysis (ABA) – in schools.

    The therapies for autism, a poorly understood neurological condition that causes developmental disability and behaviour problems, can cost between $30,000 to $80,000 a year for each child.

    The parents, who say they are forced to go to financial "extremes," filed a $1.25-billion lawsuit in 2004. They argued their children were victims of discrimination because other kids with special needs get therapy and an education within the publicly funded school system.

    "The crucial issue is the issue of discrimination," Baker said.

    "The reason why children with autism are out of school is that they are not being accommodated by being provided with ABA support while in school."

    The court said that argument remains alive, if barely, but will require "substantial redrafting."

    In its written ruling, the court was critical of the various claims for their fuzziness, at one point lamenting that the lack of clarity "makes it difficult to know" what the parents want.

    "It continues to be difficult to correlate the appellants' allegations of fact with their proposed causes of action," Justice Susan Lang wrote on behalf of the three-member appeal panel.

    The plaintiffs were also hoping to be allowed to sue for damages if their class action is eventually certified.

    As with several of the other claims, the court ruled they could try again "with the necessary concision."

    Taline Sagharian of Richmond Hill, Ont., whose 11-year-old son Christopher has autism, said the court had at least not shut the door entirely on their claims, but the decision needs further study.

    "It's a little bit confusing," Sagharian said.

    "But we're dedicated to the case, we're dedicated to the cause."

    In March last year, Ontario Superior Court Justice Maurice Cullity sided with the provincial government in striking down several of the key claims, including negligence and damages.

    The Appeal Court rejected the parents' negligence claims against the Ontario government, but left open the possibility that the school boards might yet be on the hook for how they ran programs aimed at accommodating children with special needs.

    The court also tossed out a claim based on age discrimination related to Ontario's now-rescinded decision to pay for ABA for children only until age six.

    #2000
    A Father
    Member

    Medicare for Autism NOW! blog has now been updated with the Ottawa Press Conference video clips from April 14th 2008. Take a look:

    http://medicareforautismnow.blogspot.com/

    #2001
    Andrew Kavchak
    Participant

    Recently the government of Ontario indicated that they would cover the expenses of sex-change operations under Medicare (in Ontario called O.H.I.P.)…which prompted this letter below from a local parent who was also in the recent W5 documentary on the lack of coverage in Medicare for autism treatment coverage. Also below is is an update on Mr. Marinoiu's hunger strike.
    _________________

    Friday, May 23, 2008

    THE OTTAWA CITIZEN

    And autism, too

    Robert J. Shalka

    Health Minister George Smitherman and Premier Dalton McGuinty are to be praised for their progressive and humane decision to restore OHIP coverage for sex-change operations. Gender-identity disorder is a serious medical condition and, although very expensive, its treatment is called "appropriate."

    As the parent of a child with autism whose medically-necessary treatment is not covered by OHIP, I hope that the McGuinty government's wise and humane approach points the way to changes in the way Ontario deals with autism. Persons with autism also must deal with a serious medical condition and their needs for treatment must also be covered by OHIP. I hope that Mr. Smitherman will have good news for the autism community in the near future.

    Robert J. Shalka,
    Orléans
    _________________________

    Friday, May 23, 2008

    THE TORONTO SUN

    Dad ends 15-day hunger strike

    ANTONELLA ARTUSO, QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU CHIEF

    A Toronto father who went on a hunger strike to draw attention to the lack of services for his autistic son has called off the protest.

    Stefan Marinoiu went 15 days without solid food before ending the strike Monday night amid fears his health was failing.

    Reached at his home yesterday, Marinoiu said he received a letter from Children and Youth Services Minister Deb Matthews assuring him that she's aware that more needs to be done for autistic children and their families.

    Matthews called for a national autism strategy and promised that she was working on providing his son with the services that he requires.
    "It gives me lots of hope," Marinoiu said.

    His son Simon spent many years on a waiting list for intensive behavioural intervention (IBI) without receiving the service.

    Now 15, Simon is large and difficult to control physically.

    Marinoiu, who is the only one in his family large enough to handle Simon, said he was warned by his doctor that extending the strike could damage his health permanently.

    "I realize there's no point in going on," he said. "You can easily get into irreversible internal organ damage."

    #2002
    Theresa Jouan
    Participant

    ABA Teaching Homes:

    If you are a parent of an older child/young adult with autism who has been the recipient of ABA intervention and still presents with significantly challenging behavior, you may be interested in an ABA teaching home model. We are pleased to provide an information session on the Teaching home. In general the presentation will cover the following:
    1. Description of the ABA Teaching home
    – An ABA teaching home is a residential program based on the scientific principles and methods of ABA and staffed at a level that can and has truly implemented quality treatment.
    2. How it got started
    3. The model: Behavioral Services of Tennessee
    4. What services it provides:
    – Teaching homes have been in existence for 15+ years and have demonstrated both their effectiveness and client/family satisfaction.
    5. What type of population we serve
    – Teaching homes can be temporary placements to reduce problematic behavior or long-term placements for individuals who require a high level of ongoing care.
    6. Why ABA Teaching homes are different from current residential options
    – Discuss management hierarchy and level of supervision provided
    – Treatment package based on principles of behaviorism and applied behavior analysis
    – Staff training and evaluation
    – Policies and procedures
    7. Success of the home thus far and future opportunities
    – Documented client success
    – Documented family approval and satisfaction
    – Client now integrated in community

    Come to an informational evening on ABA teaching homes presented by FEAT BC and the Autism Society of BC. Presenters: Nate Searle, MS, Theresa Tournemille, (MS Candidate), and Dr. Glen Davies.

    Date in June to be announced shortly.

    #2003
    Andrew Kavchak
    Participant

    Just what the world need! Another task force to hold consultation regarding a mental health strategy. The feds went through this exercise for several years and issued numerous reports (remember the one that said that there was doubt as to whether autism should even be covered and that it necessitated a separate study?).

    New Brunswick is the province with the high profile case a few years ago of an autistic teenager who was getting physically aggressive and the province was deporting him (a Canadian!) to a facility in Maine. However, while waiting for deportation out of the country, he was being held on the grounds of a New Brunswick prison. What a disgraceful situation! It prompted one Edmonton area Conservative MP, Peter Goldring, to attend one of our rallies on Parliament Hill and issue a press release saying that Canadians with autism should not be treated this way and the feds should do something…but that was BEFORE the Tories became the government and got their hands on the levers of power. It reminded me of the Randy Kamp situation. He issued a press release when he was in opposition calling on Liberal Health Minister Dosanjh to develop a National Autism Strategy. Then we he became a Cabinet Minister (was it the junior Minister for fish or something like that?), he responded to one of my messages by saying: "you know Andrew, it is provincial". I have a copy of the press release he issued but I could not find it anymore on his website the last time I looked.

    Anyways, at least now in New Brunswick there is a Task Force and a report (oh boy! This will surely be good reading) is due in early 2009. After that, who knows? Perhaps a committee to review the recommendations of the Task Force? I'm sorry, the cynicism of politicians is contagious… In the meantime, the feds created a National Health Commission a few months ago and appointed the former federal committee chair, who recommended the creation of the Commission, to be the new boss of the Commission. Any news on whether they figured out whether Commission's agitation will extend to cover autism? Stay tuned for possible further consultations!
    ____________________________

    From CBC.ca

    Consultations begin on new mental health strategy

    Last Updated: Thursday, May 22, 2008

    The provincial government is going to consult New Brunswickers on a new mental health strategy.

    Health Minister Mike Murphy said Wednesday he has appointed provincial court Judge Mike McKee to head the task force.

    McKee will spend the summer and fall talking to mental health professionals, patients and other groups. Existing provincial and national reports on mental health issues will also be reviewed.

    The consultations will help develop a new mental health strategy so services are better able to meet the needs of residents, Murphy said.

    Currently, mental health patients too often end up in the criminal justice system, Murphy said.

    "The difficulty is that our jails in New Brunswick have become pseudo-mental health facilities and that's not right," Murphy said.

    McKee will deliver his report by February 2009.

    #2004
    Andrew Kavchak
    Participant

    Below is a transcript from the CTV W5 program of last Saturday, followed at the bottom by the Editorial in today's Toronto Star. (Get your barf bag ready.)
    _____________________

    Saturday, May 10, 2008
    CTV W5 Program
    Life on the Brink
    Introduction
    ANNOUNCER: CTV's "W-FIVE".
    ……………….
    ANNOUNCER: And, the desperate battle for families touched by autism.

    UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Okay little guy.

    ANNOUNCER: As more and more children show encouraging signs of progress.

    UNIDENTIFIED MAN: It's incredible.

    ANNOUNCER: Parents are still struggling with costly treatments most governments won't pay for.

    SANDIE RINALDO (Reporter): Can you afford this?

    UNIDENTIFIED MAN: No.

    ANNOUNCER: Sandie Rinaldo.

    RINALDO: This has taken its toll on both of you.

    ANNOUNCER: With the constant frustrations of feeling ignored.

    UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Our kids need to be treated for their condition – autism.

    ANNOUNCER: And the ongoing fight to change the system that's supposed to help all Canadians.

    UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: The Canada Health Act can be changed with a stroke of a pen.

    ANNOUNCER: This is CTV's "W-FIVE". Here is Sandie Rinaldo.

    SANDIE RINALDO: Welcome back. A few weeks ago we brought you the story of Carly, a thirteen-year-old girl with autism who after years of therapy was finally able to speak with the aid of a computer. Well, after that broadcast, we heard from families all across Canada, heart-breaking stories of parents struggling to care for their autistic children. We heard about long waiting lists for government-funded therapy, and how many families are forced to pay thousands of dollars a month to get private help. Many are going into debt, some even selling their houses. Tonight, we're going share some of those stories with you and meet the people who are fighting hard to change the system, families who are facing "Life on the Brink". It's a typical day for four-year-old Barry Hudson, but Barry is anything but typical. He's autistic, which means he's easily distracted and very high maintenance. All of which makes Joanne Blair's job as a therapist challenging.

    JOANNE BLAIR (Therapist): You did it! That was awesome! It's very challenging, but I can't tell you how much it's rewarding, and every day whether, or not, it's just a little snip of his scissors, or he learned to tie his shoes, each little step is a huge reward in both him and my life, and the way it's impacted both of us. (inaudible) Barry, let's make the picture.

    RINALDO: In most of Canada, the therapy Joanne uses is called ABA, applied behaviour analysis.

    BLAIR: Awesome! High-five! That's super! Good for you!

    RINALDO: It's intense, repetitive and emotionally draining.

    BLAIR: What's this? Nose. That's right, buddy.

    RINALDO: Joanne's services don't come cheaply. Her fee is about $20,000 a year for 20 hours of therapy a week. It's a cost the Hudson family who live in Mississauga, Ontario, pay without question. They want the best for their son, will do anything to make it happen.

    BARRY HUDSON (Barry's Father): Everything we do with Barry is therapeutic in nature. We want to maximize every moment of the day to help him learn.

    RINALDO: And because the Hudsons can only afford to pay Joanne part time, the responsibility for continuing the treatment falls to Jessica, Barry's mother.

    JESSICA HUDSON (Barry's Mother): Super duper. Look at that! Your amazing. Thank you. Where's your shoulder. That's your shoulder. Elbow.

    RINALDO: It's a labour of love. Jessica gave up her $30,000 a year job to do it, never dreaming it would consume most of her waking hours, but she has no choice.

    JESSICA HUDSON: I'm so proud of you! It is hard. It is really hard. Seeing Barry improve, you know, give me courage to go on, and just keep doing it.

    RINALDO: Keep doing it because, you see, Barry is on a waiting list. It could be two or three years before the Ontario government pays for his treatment. Too long for Jessica and her husband, also named Barry. What's so significant about this key window that you can't wait the 24 to 36 months for him to receive this kind of treatment and for you to be subsidized for it?

    BARRY HUDSON: All the research clearly supports that early intervention is critical. If you get a person early in life, even a normal typical child, and you teach them something when they're young, it will tend to stick better. Same thing with children's autism. If you start early, they'll acquire the skills quicker, and more appropriately.

    RINALDO: But the Hudsons are paying a high price for their efforts, a very high price. With Jessica's loss of income and the cost of therapy, the family is in the hole for almost $50,000 a year. Can you afford this?

    BARRY HUDSON: No.

    JESSICA HUDSON: Hardly.

    BARRY HUDSON: No, the situation we've had is every single savings that we've acquired over time, RRSP savings, we have spent all that money on his therapy, and my mother cashed in all of her retirement savings as well to help fund Barry's therapy, so basically used every resource we had, and it may look like we'll lose the house next.

    RINALDO: Lose the house, and also on the verge of bankruptcy. Factor in the bills, the mortgage payments, life savings and this family is in big trouble.

    BARRY HUDSON: I have to get a job in the circus to juggle the bills. So we do our part, and sacrifice, and our reward is at the end we lose everything, and our son gets nothing. That's inappropriate to me.

    RINALDO: There is, however, one big payback in this black hole of debt. The therapy is working. Here's Barry on home video in the first few days of therapy nine months ago with his therapist Joanne. He couldn't speak. Couldn't concentrate. Couldn't even follow the simplest instructions. And here he is now, a different and happier child.

    BLAIR: Wooh! Ready? Set, go! Yeah, go, good job, Barry. It brings tears to my eyes to know just the past couple months how he's grown. Just in his basic language, we're still gradually working on it, obviously it's been a challenge. But he's come a long way and also just those skills, we worked extremely hard for and he's done extremely well.

    BLAIR: I love your smile.

    RINALDO: If you had not chosen to intervene at this point in his life, and waited the 24 to 36 months until he qualified for financial assistance through the government, where would he be now? What would he be like now?

    BARRY HUDSON: He'd probably be regressed to a level where he'd be completely detached from reality. He definitely would not be communicating with any of us. He wouldn't be toilet trained. He wouldn't be able to feed himself. He wouldn't be able to dress himself. He'd be completely incapable of any activity, normal function for a normal child. It would be a horrible thing.

    RINALDO: A horrible thing, and Barry is just one of more than a thousand children in Ontario waiting for government-assisted therapy they may never get.

    BLAIR: What are your feet in? Sand.

    RINALDO: The numbers are going up every year. That means other families are also facing financial hardship. The provincial minister in charge of children and youth services is Deb Matthews. You know, we took a look at some of the statistics for the waiting lists because of the number of kids requiring this kind of therapy is growing. And in 2003, there were 79 children on a wait list. By 2006, it had grown to 753, and now 2008, there are 1,148 children on a wait list. Isn't that too many children to be waiting for therapy? DEB MATTHEWS (Provincial Minister): Yes. It is too many children, and that's why we're continuing to really work hard to continue to improve the supports for kids with autism. It's a very high priority for me, frankly, because just like all the other parents of kids with autism, we have the very same goals. We want these kids to be the very best they can be.

    RINALDO: And do you agree those early years are the important years? We've got to get in there and get that therapy?

    MATTHEWS: Well, it's not whether I agree, it's what the experts say. Our program is based on science. We really depend on experts in the field to guide us in our decision-making, and, yes, they do say that the younger, the better.

    RINALDO: Ontario isn't the only province with long wait lists. More than 33,000 children across Canada have some form of autism, and many can't get the kind of therapy they need. If you live in Alberta, you're lucky, no wait lists and therapy is fully funded up until the age of eighteen. Other provinces aren't nearly as generous, and even if government funding does come through, there is no guarantee it will last. Take seven-year-old Philip Shalka who lives in Ottawa. He's autistic, and loves play time with his parents. Robert and Elena assumed he'd have his therapy funded by the provincial government until he was eighteen, but last year, a psychologist told them he wasn't progressing. Even used the words "mental retardation" to describe his condition. Were you shocked when someone came and said to you that your son is mentally retarded?

    ROBERT SHALKA (Parent of Autistic Child): Yes, because like yourself, I haven't heard that word for a long, long time, and it reminded me of the old days when people with exceptionalities were described as idiots, imbeciles or morons.

    RINALDO: After being told their son was severely disabled, they were cut off from funded therapy. Why do you think he was discharged?

    ROBERT SHALKA: I have a theory, although I strongly believe that the autism intervention programs would deny this, but for what it's worth, I believe that there was intense pressure, and there continues to be intense pressure, to get the wait lists down.

    RINALDO: Philip's family said to us they think the reason the therapy was cut off is to reduce the wait list.

    MATTHEWS: Absolutely not. The clinical decisions, and once we have the new guidelines and benchmarks in practice, and parents will be able to actually understand why their child was cut off.

    RINALDO: But until those guidelines are in place, it is almost impossible for parents to appeal. So Philip's parents are now paying for his therapy, $40,000 a year, and the boy that a government-appointed psychologist wrote off as mentally disabled is beginning to spell.

    ROBERT SHALKA: We didn't give up, and Philip, with our help, was able to show what he can do, and what he knows.

    ELENA SHALKA (Parent of Autistic Child): We have found a key to the door that opens his unique way, how he can communicate with outer the world.

    UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: And how about six times four?

    RINALDO: Even more amazing, Philip is getting straight " for math in a regular grade one classroom. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Okay, you ready, ten times ten. 1-0-0. A hundred. Super job! Excellent.

    ROBERT SHALKA: Amazing little guy, because what he knows, it's just, it's incredible, and it was all locked inside.

    RINALDO: Fed up with bureaucrats dictating who does and does not get therapy, parents like the Hudsons are now pushing politicians for change.

    BARRY HUDSON: We have wait lists that are insane, two to three years. If we were to put a pediatric cancer patient on a two to three-year wait list for cancer treatment, there'd be a revolution, and I'm not proposing that, but these autistic children, this therapy is their medical treatment. Why do we continue to not support those that need it the most?

    ANNOUNCER: Next, the grass roots rebellion for parents.

    UNIDENTIFIED MAN: The sweetest words I've ever heard him say is "mommy pain."

    ANNOUNCER: And the escalating battle for a critical change.

    UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Amending the Canada Health Act is not a big deal. What's a big deal is the political will to amend it.

    ANNOUNCER: When CTV's "W-FIVE" continues.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    BARRY HUDSON: There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever the ABA therapy is what's helped our son. It has helped us to help him as well.

    RINALDO: Barry Hudson talks to a group parents of autistic children in Oakville, Ontario, about how applied behaviour analysis opened up the world for his son.

    BARRY HUDSON: The sweetest words I've ever heard him say is "mommy pain." Not what you'd expect, I'm quite sure, but now that he can tell us he hurts, we can help him. Without the therapy, he would still hurt, and we couldn't help him.

    RINALDO: Barry has joined a grass roots rebellion among parents of autistic children, and they're taking on the federal government. Their goal? Change the Canada Health Act, and make autism therapy an essential medical treatment.

    JEAN LEWIS (FEAT): There is nothing more reasonable than a Canadian expecting their child's core health need to be covered under medicare.

    RINALDO: Sounds simple, but it hasn't been easy for Jean Lewis.

    LEWIS: No political party has done the right thing.

    RINALDO: She's the voice of families for early autism treatment, a group that started in British Columbia, and is now spreading across Canada. Lewis believes children with autism are treated unfairly. You see, right now, rather than going to a doctor who gives me a treatment protocol like any other disease or disorder, we're sent to social workers who parents are then negotiating with whether or not they can get money to take from their respite pot to pay for treatment. There's no fit there. We don't belong there. Our kids have a medical condition. They need to be treated for their condition – autism.

    RINALDO: Lewis knows firsthand a parent's frustration. Her fourteen-year-old son, Aaron is autistic, in therapy for twelve of those years. Some paid for by the BC government, the rest, $35,000 a year, by Lewis herself.

    LEWIS: What we have is a patchwork of services from coast to coast that are provided through the various ministries of social services, or children and family development. They're called different things. Nothing to do with treatment. Everything to do with support, and respite, and babysitting, there all things that families need when they have autistic children, but that does not endorse or doesn't enshrine what our children need to help them access the same thing that every other Canadian kid needs access to.

    RINALDO: Five years ago, Lewis joined a group of families to fight a legal battle all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada to force provincial governments to pick up the tab for their children's treatment. But in 2004, the court ruled that it wasn't up to them to tell governments how to spend health care dollars.

    LEWIS: And basically said to us this is an issue for parliament. This is not up to the courts. This is an issue for parliament. In fact, they went as far as to say what you're doing is probably the best thing that can be done but it's really not up to us. They did a Pontius Pilate. That was the genesis of our political initiative. We took them at their word.

    RINALDO: The group has found an ally in a Liberal senator Jim Munson. He was part of a Senate committee that published a report on autism in 2007 called, "Pay Now or Pay Later." The message in the title was stark and clear.

    JIM MUNSON (Liberal Senator): If we don't spend the money and the time with a federally funded program for autistic children, and autistic adults, we're going pay a hell of a lot more later as a society. Institutionalizing children who become adults when parents are gone, you know, that's the biggest fear for these parents. What will happen to my child when I'm gone? Where will he or she be? Well, right now, that person will be in a lonely closeted place if we don't do something now.

    RINALDO: You'd think that every parent with an autistic child would be cheering to change the Canada Health Act, but Mike Lake, a federal Conservative MP and at father of Jayden, an autistic child, believes there are other ways to do this.

    MIKE LAKE (Conservative MP): I'm going to start by allowing my son Jayden just to say hi. He likes to say hi when he sees a mic there.

    RINALDO: His son joined him recently at a press conference on Parliament Hill for World Autism Awareness Day.

    LAKE: This is my son Jayden, and as mentioned, he has autism. He's twelve years old right now, and I think it's important for us as parents and for our kids to be out, to meet with people, especially people that are making political decisions.

    RINALDO: Jayden Lake is lucky. He lives in Edmonton, so all his therapy is paid for by the Alberta government. Lake agreed that every child should get the same level of treatment as Jayden, but not by changing the Canada Health Act.

    LAKE: The federal government the isn't over and above the provincial governments. We don't have the right to just demand that the provincial governments do this thing or that thing. We're partners in Confederation, and if we were to start to dictate individual treatments and therapies that should be named in the Canada Health Act, there would be enormous kickback from the provinces. The provinces need to be held accountable for the things that are within their jurisdiction, and they have the power to do that.

    RINALDO: That means no support for Jean Lewis from the governing Conservatives.

    LEWIS: Autism is a socially constructed handicap.

    RINALDO: And although individual MPs and senators have come on side, no political party has made changing the Canada Health Act a part of their platform.

    LEWIS: This is a game of smoke and mirrors. This is something that the health technocrats have cooked up for the politicians who don't understand it. Look, the Canada Health Act is not divinely inspired scripture. It's federal legislation that can be changed with the stroke of a pen. This is how you change it. You add to the list of services ABA interventionists to your list of service. It's done. It's done. Amending the Canada Health Act is not a big deal. What's the big deal is the political will to amend it. That's the big deal. What does that tell you about their worthiness?

    RINALDO: But there's a federal election coming up, and Jean Lewis and her group have a plan.

    DAVE MARLEY (Lawyer): We can't get at the bureaucrats until we first tackle the politicians.

    RINALDO: They've been joined by Dave Marley, a former trial lawyer, and veteran of political campaigns in BC who's working with Lewis for free.

    MARLEY: So, we have Parry Sound, Muskoka, this is Mr. Clement's…

    RINALDO: They're targeting individual politicians. Fourteen federal ridings across the country, won by just a few votes in the last election.

    MARLEY: Now, I don't know who the MP is in some of those, I don't care, nor do I care what party he or she belongs to. What I care about is they're vulnerable, and they know that a small, dedicated group like us can do them some serious political damage.

    BARRY HUDSON: Do you want some more salad, Barry?

    RINALDO: While federal and provincial governments bicker over who should pay for the treatment autistic children desperately need, nothing changes for parents like the Hudsons.

    BARRY HUDSON: Good boy. Good boy, Kenneth. You're eating your salad too?

    RINALDO: They're running out of money, and fast, but this family has no intention of giving up.

    BARRY HUDSON: It's a lifestyle, and at the end of the day, Barry's been engaged, had therapy for his twelve hours of being awake, but we're pretty much, pretty much exhausted. We have to do what we do for our son because we have nowhere else to turn. It's a job, it's a mission to help our son, and that's how we look at it.

    RINALDO: We'll be right back.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)
    _____________________________

    Toronto Star
    Thusday, May 16, 2008
    Editorial

    No easy answers in autism debate

    Bruce McIntosh captures the weariness of many parents of autistic children when he says he is "tired of this fight." McIntosh, whose 8-year-old son is autistic, joined other parents at Queen's Park this week to demand the government cut long waiting lists for intensive behavioural intervention (IBI), and provide the costly therapy in schools.

    Their frustration is understandable. It is generally thought that the earlier IBI starts, the better. Yet many autistic children languish on waiting lists for years before getting public funding. So many families pay for therapy themselves, at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars.

    But the issues aren't quite as black and white as they appear.

    True, the number of children waiting for IBI (1,148) has skyrocketed since the Liberals came to office in 2003 and rivals the number of children actually receiving funding for the therapy (1,404).

    But those figures mask the fact that the McGuinty government has more than tripled autism spending, and the number of children getting IBI funding has nearly tripled. The paradox is explained, in part, by the government's 2005 decision to stop cutting off therapy once a child turns 6. This move dramatically increased the pool of eligible children. Speedier assessments also stretched the wait list.

    Those explanations provide no comfort to parents of children waiting for funding. But they do show the McGuinty government has not ignored the problem. Far from it.

    What happens when autistic children are old enough to go to school is just as thorny. Parents say they are forced to make an "impossible choice" between therapy and public education because IBI is not offered in schools. Some have asked the courts to intervene on the issue.

    Education Minister Kathleen Wynne last year directed all school boards to provide a specialized instructional method tailored to autistic students. The Liberal election platform also included a $10 million pledge to prepare schools to deliver IBI therapy "on-site."

    But it is far from clear if that means IBI therapists will work with autistic children in regular classrooms, as some parents want, or in separate rooms within the school. Whichever path the province takes, a philosophical clash looms between those who argue IBI should be integrated into classrooms (mainly parents), and those who worry its one-on-one focus makes it unsuitable, and even disruptive, in a classroom setting (including many teachers and school administrators).

    There are no easy answers to these issues. But the best chance for a solution lies in constructive talks between parents, school boards and government officials.
    ______________________
    To many people the newspaper called the Toronto Star is often considered the mouthpiece of the Liberal Party. The editorial above, in direct response to the successful agitation by Stefan Marinoiu through his hunger strike, appears to carry all the standard messages and party line on autism, namely:

    – not an easy task
    – very complicated
    – we have done a lot so far but more needs to be done
    – the Government of Ontario "hears our pain"
    – we are working very hard
    – we are doing our best
    – no simple answers
    – we are "victims" of our own success
    – success depends on "dialog" among govt, service providers, schools and parents.

Viewing 10 replies - 801 through 810 (of 2,008 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.